Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] hook: include hooks from the config

> On Sun, Mar 01, 2026 at 08:44:53PM +0200, Adrian Ratiu wrote:
>> Teach the hook.[hc] library to parse configs to populate the list of
>> hooks to run for a given event.
>> 
>> Multiple commands can be specified for a given hook by providing
>> "hook.<friendly-name>.command = <path-to-hook>" and
>> "hook.<friendly-name>.event = <hook-event>" lines.
>> 
>> Hooks will be started in config order of the "hook.<friendly-name>.event"
>> lines and will be run sequentially (.jobs == 1) like before.
>> Running the hooks in parallel will be enabled in a future patch.
>> 
>> The "traditional" hook from the hookdir is run last, if present.
>> 
>> A strmap cache is added to struct repository to avoid re-reading
>> the configs on each rook run. This is useful for hooks like the
>> ref-transaction which gets executed multiple times per process.
>> 
>> Examples:
>> 
>>   $ git config --get-regexp "^hook\."
>>   hook.bar.command=~/bar.sh
>>   hook.bar.event=pre-commit
>> 
>>   # Will run ~/bar.sh, then .git/hooks/pre-commit
>>   $ git hook run pre-commit
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
>> ---
>
>> diff --git a/t/t1800-hook.sh b/t/t1800-hook.sh
>> index d1380a4f0e..3a95cfe16d 100755
>> --- a/t/t1800-hook.sh
>> +++ b/t/t1800-hook.sh
>> @@ -1,10 +1,26 @@
>>  #!/bin/sh
>>  
>> -test_description='git-hook command'
>> +test_description='git-hook command and config-managed multihooks'
>>  
>>  . ./test-lib.sh
>>  . "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-terminal.sh
>>  
>> +setup_hooks () {
>> +	test_config hook.ghi.command "/path/ghi"
>> +	test_config hook.ghi.event pre-commit --add
>> +	test_config hook.ghi.event test-hook --add
>> +	test_config_global hook.def.command "/path/def"
>> +	test_config_global hook.def.event pre-commit --add
>> +}
>> +
>> +setup_hookdir () {
>> +	mkdir .git/hooks
>> +	write_script .git/hooks/pre-commit <<-EOF
>> +	echo \"Legacy Hook\"
>> +	EOF
>> +	test_when_finished rm -rf .git/hooks
>> +}
>
> There is no &&-chain in these test helper functions.