Re: A few usability question about git diff --cached

From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Date: Oct 4, 2007, 14:47 UTC
Message-ID: <86hcl70wep.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>
In-Reply-To: <7vhcl79c4l.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

Show 5 quoted lines

>  * --index means work work tree through the index.  Once you get
>    git, this is natural as you would not interact with files in
>    the work tree that is not known to the index.
>
>  * --cached means work only on the cached information in index.

That is a rather shaky relation.

Show 5 quoted lines

> Giving them synonyms without deprecation is a viable option, if
> necessary.  I do not however see the need yet.  A few people who
> haven't learned the lingo of the land yet can worry about possible
> confusion, but I do not think that "worry" itself does not count as
> real need.

The "lingo of the land" as documented in the manuals no longer uses the term "cache" or "cached" as something with an official meaning.

So the current state of affairs does not really look overly convincing with regard to consistency.

-- 
David Kastrup