A few usability question about git diff --cached
- From
- Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 4, 2007, 12:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4d8e3fd30710040527j61152b2dh1b073504ba19d490@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, I'm having and interesting discussion with an happy mercurial users which started reading the git documentation. He raised aquestion that I'm not able to answer:
Show 5 quoted lines
> $ git diff --cached > > (Without —cached, git-diff(1) will show you any changes that you've > made but not yet added to the index.) You can also get a brief summary > of the situation with git-status(1):
Why do we have the option "--cached" and not "--index"?
I believe that, just reading the documentation, is not very easy to fully understand the role of the index and then we have an option "--cached" that refers to the index. Is it a good idea to add and document an option "--index" and remove from the doc the option "--cached"?
Thanks.
Regards,
-- Paolo http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/