Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3-rc4
- From
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
- Date
- Aug 5, 2007, 10:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <851weib7v3.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070805095928.GA15949@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:54:51AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > >> >> (info "(gcc) Extended Asm") >> >> >> >> and when you are reading mail in Emacs, you can click on that line >> >> and get to the respective page in a manual comprising hundreds of >> >> pages. >> > >> > Ugh. A documentation referencing system that works only in one >> > particular editor, >> >> That works in readers of the info format. Do HTML references work >> outside of HTML readers? > > I'm not talking about the _format_, I'm talking about the _referencing > system_. In other words, because URLs are a standard, there are > thousands of programs which recognize them and can find the resource > they mention (which in turn, may spawn an info reader, an html reader, > or some other interpreter).
Well, just for kicks I let firefox loose on
info:gcc#Extended Asm
It passed this off to the GNOME help browser, which displayed "Loading...", used up 4 seconds of CPU time and 100M of memory, and then hanged itself with a spinning cursor.
Interesting. Starting the help browser manually and typing the URL in, however, works. It just seems to suicide when firefox tells it about URLs.
> What software is going to recognize (info "(gcc) Extended Asm") in > your email and realize that it's a reference to another document? > None, except emacs.
Sure. So use the above syntax.
> Though I don't especially like the info format or readers, my > argument here isn't against it. It is against the feature you > mentioned being a substantial benefit, since a large part of the > world isn't reading their email in emacs.
So write it as a URL, if you want to.
-- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum