Re: [PATCH] Round-down years in "years+months" relative date view
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 28, 2009, 19:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <81b0412b0908281208h20aa6e81od3d6567fdffa0dec@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908281458370.6044@xanadu.home>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 21:00, Nicolas Pitre<nico@cam.org> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
>> >> Microsoft's compiler and libraries? MacOSX? >> > >> > Are you saying you know those to be platforms with problems, or are you >> > asking whether those platforms will have problems? >> >> Both: MS never had weak/vague linkage, but I don't know about MacOSX. > > This is not about weak or vague linkage. This is plain basic linker > feature where no library object needs to be linked if there is no symbol > to resolve.
Maybe I missed something, but wasn't the idea to overwrite gettimeofday with a public gettimeofday, defined in one of the object files? And shouldn't a linker complain regarding duplicated symbols, unless the other (library) symbol is defined as a weak symbol, allowing overriding it with another symbol of stronger linkage?
>> I suspect them to have the same deficiency, but I'd be glad to be wrong. > > Are you able to test it? >
Only the MS, but it is not interesting.