Re: [PATCH] Define a version of lstat(2) with posix semantics
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 20, 2009, 08:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <81b0412b0903200130s594ce3beyae21eb0b5cc8fe0@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0903200025170.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
2009/3/20 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Alex Riesen wrote: >> Johannes Schindelin, Thu, Mar 19, 2009 11:57:01 +0100: >> >> > I'd rather just disable WIN32_STAT for Cygwin, because otherwise, we >> > will keep running into issues. >> >> I'd rather not. The thing is just so unbelievably slow and being stuck >> on it I'm just trying my damnedest to squeeze every last bit of >> performance out of it. > > If you are serious about performance, you will not stay with Cygwin -- for > the purposes of Git.
I'm staying with Cygwin port not _for_ Git, but _because_ of Cygwin. If it were for me, I'd gladly let the Cygwin port die (frankly, any Windows port). I just use Linux everywhere possible. Sometimes it's not...
> Do not get me wrong: Cygwin is a wonderful thing if your goal is to spare > yourself a lot of trouble with that seriously challenged win32 API.
I beg to differ: Cygwin is a piece of crap and performs dangerously hideous in what it tries to do.
> But if your goal is to get the most out of the Win32 API in terms of > speed, you _will_ have to go with MinGW (at least, as long as you are > unwilling to shell out big bucks in the vague direction of Redmond, and > add some time tax to that).
My goal in this environment is to make it bearable. I think that both Cygwin and MinGW ports are dead-on-arrival, because the underlying platform is so stupidly and hopelessly broken, and no amount of no bucks can help it.
> Now, we _do_ have msysGit, you _do_ have shown the capability to fix > issues when they arise, so I do _not_ see any obstacle why you should not > go msysGit, rather than staying with the pain of trying to stay > POSIX-compatible, but not quite all the time.
I understand. It is not pure POSIX compatibility I seek. I just can't use MinGW port, because I absolutely must use the cygwin environment (for "hysterical" reasons) and they don't play well together (tried, yes. Conflicting libraries, but you already know that).
I don't have the Windows sickness anywhere else but at my work, and sadly it is a good place in all respects, even if absolute crazy in this regard.
So I'm sorry, if I ever made an impression that I'm motivated to do any Windows-related development. I'm _absolutely_ not. I just happen to have that itch of Perforce (may it burn in hell for thousand years), have a know how, and have a little time to spare (hopefully no one of management sees that).