Re: [PATCH 1/5] parse_branchname_arg(): fix dash_dash_pos, drop argcount

>> Simplify the code by dropping `argcount` and useless `argc` / `argv`
>> manipulations.
> 
> I am not sure if this is a good change, though.  It goes against the
> reasoning that makes the above "dash-dash-pos" change is a good one,
> doesn't it?  When the code changes over time, wouldn't it make the
> code more clear to keep track of the count of args it saw in a
> separate variable, than relying on the invariant that currently
> happens to hold which is "if dash-dash is after the first argument,
> return 2 and otherwise return 1"?

>> +	if (opts->accept_pathspec) {
>> +	    if (dash_dash_pos == 0)
>> +		    return 1; /* case (2) */
>> +	    else if (dash_dash_pos == 1)
>> +		    has_dash_dash = 1; /* case (3) or (1) */
>> +	    else if (dash_dash_pos >= 2)
>> +		    die(_("only one reference expected, %d given."), dash_dash_pos);
> 
> Non-standard indentation?  In our code, a level of indent is another
> horizontal tab.