Re: [RFC PATCH] Make the rebase edit mode really end up in an edit state
- From
Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
- Date
- Jan 15, 2009, 19:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8035E52E-D202-4C42-BDFD-DC7A925580A3@wincent.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <200901151946.04991.johan@herland.net>
El 15/1/2009, a las 19:46, Johan Herland escribió:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Thursday 15 January 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> 'stop' would be closest to what it currently does. It stops and it >>> is up to you how to screw up the result ;-). >> >> But it shares the first letter with 'squash'. > > Personally, I'd rather use "pause", but that is taken as well. > > Other suggestions: > > wait > yield > rest > timeout
Perhaps stating the obvious, but:
wait - best suggestion so far, seeing as we can't use "stop"
yield - might sound intuitive to a Ruby programmer; but for others it's probably not so obvious as "yield" has a number of meanings in normal English similar to "give up", "give over" etc
rest - not quite as good as "wait"; machines wait for humans, but the never need to rest
timeout - sounds like an error condition, so not really appropriate
Sorry for participating in the painting. Just thought that "wait" was good enough to merit some positive feedback.
Cheers, Wincent