Re: [PATCH v4] git-svn: clarify the referent of dcommit's optional argument
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 16, 2012, 22:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vzk97bv2j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAH3AnrqQDfx7s1fXBgKJmFtMA33CW9qx2tWSoenqSR0pVc63WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> +Originally, 'git svn' recommended that developers pulled or merged from >> +the 'git svn' branch. This was because the author favored `git svn set-tree B` >> +to commit a single head rather than the `git svn set-tree A..B` notation to >> +commit multiple commits. Use of 'git pull' or 'git merge' with `git svn set-tree A...B` > > A...B -> A..B > > Will fix in next iteration, assuming Junio and Eric are otherwise > happy with the update.
I don't have an opinion on the latter half of the patch that is primarily about the rationale given by "the author", i.e. Eric ;-), but the description of dcommit subcommand itself certainly looks simpler and more readble to me.
Thanks.