Re: [PATCH 1/1] Tell vim the textwidth is 75.
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jul 22, 2005, 20:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vy87yr2xh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050722192424.GB8556@mars.ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
>> I would use a neutral commit template, only that it should have a >> neutral prefix as well for the lines to be removed (neither STG nor CG >> but GIT maybe). The $GIT_DIR/commit-template is fine as a file name. > > How about $GIT_DIR/commit-template-`basename $EDITOR` > Then we could have different templates for vim, emacs, kade etc.
This brings up a point I have been wanting to see discussed, involving the core people and the Porcelain people [*1*].
I would like to see Porcelains stay compatible when the do not have to differ. The commit template [*2*] is one example of such. Another example is the "dontdiff/ignore" file Pasky talked about in a recent commit log in his Cogito tree [*3*].
Porcelains need to agree on what is placed where and used in what way.
First, I will talk about the "what" part. I can see there are various "preference" items we may want to use:
- commit template (to enforce a certain style)
- standard "dontdiff/ignore" file.
- pre-commit hook (to enforce a certain tests to pass)
- post-commit-hook (sending commit-notification perhaps).
- environment overrides (COMMITTER_NAME, COMMITTER_EMAIL and
such).There may be others. Many of them would have different origin:
- Per project. A project may want to enforce pre-commit hook
for all participants; - Per user. A user may want to use different environment
settings for different projects [*4*]. - Per repository (or work tree). A user may have more than
one work tree for the same project, and want to use
different "preference" items per tree.Personally, given the nature of GIT being a distributed system, I do not think something like /etc/git.conf (which suggests "per system" configuration) makes much sense; except working around a mailhost name configuration, perhaps.
About the "where" part, one proposal I have off the top of my head is something like this:
- Have a directory at the root of the tree, "_git" (I do not
care about the name at this moment. The point being it can
be revision controlled as part of the project and propagate
to other repositories), to store per-project configuration. - Use $GIT_DIR/conf/ as a convention to store per repository
configuration files. This does not propagate with
pulls/pushes/merges across repositories. - Use $HOME/.gitrc (could be a directory or a file in .ini
style like StGIT uses -- again, I do not care about the
details at this moment) to store per-user configuration.Which configuration is read first, what can be overridden, and if the configuration is cumulative would be specific to each preference item, I suspect. Some project may not want a user to override the pre-commit hooks, for a bad example. But normally the per-repository one would take precedence over per-user one which in turn would take precedence over per-project one.
[Footnotes]
*1* Technically this does not involve the core at all, but the core people can act as objective, Porcelain-neutral referees. They'll need to know the outcome of the discussion anyway, since they are the ones that end up maintaining the Porcelain-neutral tutorial document.
*2* Unless we are talking about the kind that shows and lets you edit the diff to be committed, which somebody else's Porcelain may support, that is.
*3* .gitignore in the cwd is used in Cogito, if I am not mistaken.
*4* E.g. I would commit for GIT project with junkio@cox.net while using junio@twinsun.com for my day-job projects.