Re: [PATCH 1/7] Add a minimal test for git-cherry
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jan 8, 2006, 02:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vy81r5ugx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060108003815.GI1113@nowhere.earth>
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> This test checks that git-cherry finds the expected number of patches > in two simple cases. > > Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> > > +test_expect_success \ > + 'cherry-pick one of the 2 patches, and check cherry recognized one and only one as new' \ > + 'git-cherry-pick my-topic-branch^0 && > + echo $(git-cherry master my-topic-branch) && > + expr "$(echo $(git-cherry master my-topic-branch) )" : "+ [^ ]* - .*" > +'
I wonder if "+ followed by -" order is stable here. If you make commits in the my-topic-branch fast enough, they would get the same timestamp and I suspect the order from rev-list would be left to chance.