Re: [PATCH] Make git-branch a builtin
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Oct 24, 2006, 06:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vy7r6qkmg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061024054408.GA9724@spearce.org>
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> > Wouldn't it make more sense to just include the full SHA1 of the >> > file we are deleting rather than the entire 131 line negative diff? >> >> How would you do "git apply -R" on something like that? > > Uh, you have the full SHA1 in the index line. So you just have to > reattach that blob to the named path... pretty simple actually.
Bzzzt; wrong answer.
Think of a future when you can shallowly clone near the tip of git repository that does not have shell-script git-branch.sh anymore. You cannot expect to already have the preimage of the patch in such a case. You would still want to be able to revert the change with "git apply -R".