Re: Now What?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2005, 22:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwtjp9wgc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <200511032317.15393.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Thursday 03 November 2005 21:55, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> be better suited to Wiki. I wonder if there is a Wiki whose >> document storage format is in asciidoc, and uses git as its >> revision control backend. > > I wonder if Git is the best SCM for a Wiki, as you want per-file > revisions in a Wiki: when reverting a page to a previous version, > this should not modify other pages.
Sorry, I do not see why per-file revisioning is mandatory. Wouldn't revert or edit of a single page be just a new commit of the new whole tree with just a single path changed?
I understand that whole tree history may not be much useful in Wiki environment, but I do not see why it would hurt to have a whole tree history (except perhaps the commit log may not be very useful).
In fact, wouldn't svnwiki already does the same thing?