Re: Now What?
- From
- Josef Weidendorfer <josef.weidendorfer@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2005, 23:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200511040026.16879.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vwtjp9wgc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Thursday 03 November 2005 23:51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > I wonder if Git is the best SCM for a Wiki, as you want per-file > > revisions in a Wiki: when reverting a page to a previous version, > > this should not modify other pages. > > Sorry, I do not see why per-file revisioning is mandatory. > Wouldn't revert or edit of a single page be just a new commit of > the new whole tree with just a single path changed?
You are right. Obviously I should get some sleep ;-)
As you said, by adding a new commit for every page revert, you get a really messy history. If there is vandalism in a Wiki, wouldn't it be better to be able to get rid of spam versions of one Wiki page?
> In fact, wouldn't svnwiki already does the same thing?
Probably. I don't know it.
Josef