Re: blame now knows -S
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Apr 8, 2006, 20:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwtdzer9z.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060408114240.GA10137@c165.ib.student.liu.se>
Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> There is another possible optimisation with respect to xdiff. Instead > of producing the diff on the xdiff side and parsing the diff in > blame.c, we could add another call back which just gets the relevant > information from the hunk header. I don't know how much we would gain > from this, but it might be worth a try.
I've tried and then it turned out it did not make much of a difference.