Re: [PATCH] Teach receive-pack how to keep pack files when unpacklooseobjects = 0.
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Oct 31, 2006, 06:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwt6hq8nu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061031063941.GB7375@spearce.org>
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> Because that approach assumes recieve-pack and unpack-objects >> and index-pack are from the same vintage (otherwise your >> receive-pack would need to have a way to see if unpack-objects >> and index-pack would grok --pack_header argument), we could even >> get away without passing the pack version if we wanted to. >... > BTW I think we do need to pass the pack version in the option.
We are in agreement; I mentioned "we could ... if we wanted to" because I wanted to see if you are paying attention ;-).