From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:52:21 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Teach receive-pack how to keep pack files when unpacklooseobjects = 0.
Message-ID: <7vwt6hq8nu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20061031063941.GB7375@spearce.org>

Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:

>> Because that approach assumes recieve-pack and unpack-objects
>> and index-pack are from the same vintage (otherwise your
>> receive-pack would need to have a way to see if unpack-objects
>> and index-pack would grok --pack_header argument), we could even
>> get away without passing the pack version if we wanted to.
>...
> BTW I think we do need to pass the pack version in the option.

We are in agreement; I mentioned "we could ... if we wanted to"
because I wanted to see if you are paying attention ;-).