Re: Updated version, was Re: RFC: Patch editing

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Mar 1, 2007, 23:59 UTC
Message-ID: <7vwt20o6qu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0703020020470.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

Show 7 quoted lines

> My plans are _not_ to turn this into git-rebase--interactive.sh, as I 
> originally planned. Instead, I will try to make git-rebase a builtin, and 
> add a "-i" flag which does the equivalent of this script.
>
> BTW would people be mad at me if I did _not_ imitate git-rebase.sh (call 
> format-patch and feed that into apply), but rather used cherry-pick 
> throughout?

Then that C built-in would not replace git-rebase but only "git-rebase -m".

I very often find it easier to deal with a conflicting rebase by editing the patch text, so yes I would imagine I would be rather upset, but I do not know about others.