From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:59:21 GMT Subject: Re: Updated version, was Re: RFC: Patch editing Message-ID: <7vwt20o6qu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: Johannes Schindelin writes: > My plans are _not_ to turn this into git-rebase--interactive.sh, as I > originally planned. Instead, I will try to make git-rebase a builtin, and > add a "-i" flag which does the equivalent of this script. > > BTW would people be mad at me if I did _not_ imitate git-rebase.sh (call > format-patch and feed that into apply), but rather used cherry-pick > throughout? Then that C built-in would not replace git-rebase but only "git-rebase -m". I very often find it easier to deal with a conflicting rebase by editing the patch text, so yes I would imagine I would be rather upset, but I do not know about others.