Re: git sequencer prototype
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 4, 2008, 22:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwsk1ti6y.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080704210052.GA6984@steel.home>
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Stephan Beyer, Tue, Jul 01, 2008 04:38:30 +0200: >> Hi, >> >> here is the patchset for the git-sequencer prototype, documentation, >> test suite and a first git-am and git-rebase-i migration. >> Indeed, monster patches. ;) > > BTW, how about renaming it in something short: git seq. There is > already a seq(1) in GNU coreutils, which does roughly the same (prints > a sequence of numbers), why not reuse the name?
Is it advantageous to use shorter but less descriptive name for this command? It will be a backend to am/rebase and not something the users will type from the command line, won't it?