Re: [PATCH v2] branch: show rebase/bisect info when possible instead of "(no branch)"
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Yeah, I do not think "bisecting other" alone makes much sense.
>
> What does "other" refer to when you start your bisection at a
> detached head? I personally think "other" has _any_ value in that
s/_any_/_no_/; obviously ;-)
> message, because "(no branch, bisecting)" gives the same amount of
> information, especially because "other" does not say which branch it
> refers to at all.