From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:00:03 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] branch: show rebase/bisect info when possible instead of "(no branch)" Message-ID: <7vwqup6ot8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <7v1ucx83fz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Junio C Hamano writes: > Yeah, I do not think "bisecting other" alone makes much sense. > > What does "other" refer to when you start your bisection at a > detached head? I personally think "other" has _any_ value in that s/_any_/_no_/; obviously ;-) > message, because "(no branch, bisecting)" gives the same amount of > information, especially because "other" does not say which branch it > refers to at all.