Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] sha1_name: allow @@{u} to work
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 30, 2013, 22:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwqrjacd3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1367358554-4257-7-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> > --- > sha1_name.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > t/t1508-at-combinations.sh | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/sha1_name.c b/sha1_name.c > index 887de6c..8f65bad 100644 > --- a/sha1_name.c > +++ b/sha1_name.c > @@ -969,6 +969,21 @@ int get_sha1_mb(const char *name, unsigned char *sha1) > return st; > } > > +static int interpret_empty_at(const char *name, int namelen, int len, struct strbuf *buf)
Can we have a comment to clarify what "empty"-ness this name refers to? Is it <empty>@<something>? <something>@<empty>? Something else?
Show 45 quoted lines
> +{
> + if (namelen - len <= 1 || name[len + 1] == '{')
> + return -1;
> +
> + strbuf_reset(buf);
> + if (len == 0) {
> + strbuf_add(buf, "HEAD", 4);
> + return 1;
> + } else {
> + strbuf_add(buf, name, len);
> + return len + 1;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int reinterpret(const char *name, int namelen, int len, struct strbuf *buf)
> {
> /* we have extra data, which might need further processing */
> @@ -1029,9 +1044,15 @@ int interpret_branch_name(const char *name, struct strbuf *buf)
> cp = strchr(name, '@');
> if (!cp)
> return -1;
> +
> + len = interpret_empty_at(name, namelen, cp - name, buf);
> + if (len > 0)
> + return reinterpret(name, namelen, len, buf);
> +
> tmp_len = upstream_mark(cp, namelen - (cp - name));
> if (!tmp_len)
> return -1;
> +
> len = cp + tmp_len - name;
> cp = xstrndup(name, cp - name);
> upstream = branch_get(*cp ? cp : NULL);
> diff --git a/t/t1508-at-combinations.sh b/t/t1508-at-combinations.sh
> index 50035cd..65584c0 100755
> --- a/t/t1508-at-combinations.sh
> +++ b/t/t1508-at-combinations.sh
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ check "@{-1}@{u}" master-two
> check "@{-1}@{u}@{1}" master-one
> check "@" new-two
> check "HEAD@{u}" upstream-two
> -check "@@{u}" upstream-two failure
> +check "@@{u}" upstream-two
> nonsense "@{u}@{-1}"
> nonsense "@{1}@{u}"