Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 17, 2013, 14:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwqpshkxj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <8738shi2ht.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net>
Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Conveniently enough we have seen both already ;-) Andrew's version for > commit.c could use a bit of refactorization, since it inserts the same > code in two places, but then it's about the same complexity as the > change for rebase. > > I'm not sure it's worth arguing about whether the "fixup! fixup!" is a > symptom of some underlying problem, and changing rebase is only tapering > over the symptom; or whether it's actually a useful distinction.
If they are about the same complexity, then my instict tells me that it is a better design not to strip on the writing side.
Thanks.