From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:27:20 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
Message-ID: <7vwqpshkxj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <8738shi2ht.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net>

Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> writes:

> Conveniently enough we have seen both already ;-)  Andrew's version for
> commit.c could use a bit of refactorization, since it inserts the same
> code in two places, but then it's about the same complexity as the
> change for rebase.
>
> I'm not sure it's worth arguing about whether the "fixup! fixup!"  is a
> symptom of some underlying problem, and changing rebase is only tapering
> over the symptom; or whether it's actually a useful distinction.

If they are about the same complexity, then my instict tells me that
it is a better design not to strip on the writing side.

Thanks.