Re: SIGSEGV in merge recursive
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Dec 31, 2006, 02:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vvejshk4c.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <10871.51671.qm@web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> writes:
> So it appears that the fix is in "master", but not in "next". > > Junio, can you confirm this?
It was merged into 'next' with 1e48a691, about 2 hours after I merged the fix 5d6b151f to 'master'. Sometimes when I have a fix that is urgent enough, I push out only 'master' before merging and retesting it in 'next', so it is plausible that your fetch grabbed such a state.