From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:30:59 GMT
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV in merge recursive
Message-ID: <7vvejshk4c.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <10871.51671.qm@web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> writes:

> So it appears that the fix is in "master", but not in "next".
>
> Junio, can you confirm this?

It was merged into 'next' with 1e48a691, about 2 hours after I
merged the fix 5d6b151f to 'master'.  Sometimes when I have a
fix that is urgent enough, I push out only 'master' before
merging and retesting it in 'next', so it is plausible that your
fetch grabbed such a state.