Re: [PATCH 36/48] merge-recursive: Provide more info in conflict markers with file renames
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Whenever there are merge conflicts in file contents, we would mark the
> different sides of the conflict with the two branches being merged.
> However, when there is a rename involved as well, the branchname is not
> sufficient to specify where the conflicting content came from. In such
> cases, mark the two sides of the conflict with branchname:filename rather
> than just branchname.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>