Re: [PATCH] Improve legibility of test_expect_code output
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 20, 2012, 16:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vtxusbpub.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOkDyE-x5NeZX2tpp3C9Kkwb1kPniHptB9ERvtpx2XODufaW=A@mail.gmail.com>
Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> writes:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> writes: >> >>> --- >> >> No explanation why this is a good idea, nor sign-off? > > I realised I forgot the sign-off seconds after sending :-( > > Isn't it completely self-explanatory? e.g. > > test_expect_code: command exited with 0, we wanted 128 git foo bar > > clearly makes more sense than > > test_expect_code: command exited with 0, we wanted 128 from: git foo bar
test_expect_code: command exited with 0, we wanted 128: git foo bar
would be shorter and equally legible, I would think.
In any case, the proposed commit log message should have explained these differences in the first place so that I or others do not have to ask.
Do you want this queued on top of your other series, or as an independent change?