Re: [PATCH 1/1] git-cvsexportcommit.perl: Fix usage() output.

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Nov 14, 2005, 23:04 UTC
Message-ID: <7vsltyvnjf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <46a038f90511141420u11e396d3q9a6710c79abe0ca3@mail.gmail.com>

Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> writes:

> ... I'm happy with Kevin's patches -- what's the ideal
> workflow for this? Is the sign-off line important enough that
> I should setup a public repo for you to pull from?

Given that you are far more familiar with that part of the code, and I suspect I'd be asking your help in archimport as well, a repo I can pull from would be more preferable (and sign-off by you is certainly an added bonus). If a public repo is too much hassle, however, e-mail forwarding is perfectly fine as well. Your choice.

BTW, there is no "mana" points involved in deciding if I directly pull from somewhere. Even if that were the case, you have accumulated enough of them already ;-).

> BTW, File::Basename is a standard library usually installed w perl -- 
> it shouldn't add any painful dependencies. Not sure if that matters.

Although some might find "${\function}" expansion too cute for their taste, Keven's code is fine as-is for me. I launched the baloon just wanting to see what others have to say ;-).