From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:04:52 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] git-cvsexportcommit.perl: Fix usage() output. Message-ID: <7vsltyvnjf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <46a038f90511141420u11e396d3q9a6710c79abe0ca3@mail.gmail.com> Martin Langhoff writes: > ... I'm happy with Kevin's patches -- what's the ideal > workflow for this? Is the sign-off line important enough that > I should setup a public repo for you to pull from? Given that you are far more familiar with that part of the code, and I suspect I'd be asking your help in archimport as well, a repo I can pull from would be more preferable (and sign-off by you is certainly an added bonus). If a public repo is too much hassle, however, e-mail forwarding is perfectly fine as well. Your choice. BTW, there is no "mana" points involved in deciding if I directly pull from somewhere. Even if that were the case, you have accumulated enough of them already ;-). > BTW, File::Basename is a standard library usually installed w perl -- > it shouldn't add any painful dependencies. Not sure if that matters. Although some might find "${\function}" expansion too cute for their taste, Keven's code is fine as-is for me. I launched the baloon just wanting to see what others have to say ;-).