Re: [PATCH] filter-branch: do not consider diverging submodules a 'dirty worktree'
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2009, 17:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vskmseq4t.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <26931410834b5297493543e2a1cb75c3b6bf008a.1233855372u.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 16 quoted lines
> At the end of filter-branch in a non-bare repository, the work tree is > updated with "read-tree -m -u HEAD", to carry the change forward in case > the current branch was rewritten. In order to avoid losing any local > change during this step, filter-branch refuses to work when there are > local changes in the work tree. > > This "read-tree -m -u HEAD" operation does not affect what commit is > checked out in a submodule (iow, it does not touch .git/HEAD in a > submodule checkout), and checking if there is any local change to the > submodule is not useful. > > Staged submodules _are_ considered to be 'dirty', however, as the > "read-tree -m -u HEAD" could result in loss of staged information > otherwise. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Thanks. I still have one question.
By the last paragraph, do you mean "diff-index --cached" should be run without --ignore-submodules? That does not seem to match the text of the patch.
Show 21 quoted lines
> --- > git-filter-branch.sh | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/git-filter-branch.sh b/git-filter-branch.sh > index b75d0ba..9ffa655 100755 > --- a/git-filter-branch.sh > +++ b/git-filter-branch.sh > @@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ OPTIONS_SPEC= > . git-sh-setup > > if [ "$(is_bare_repository)" = false ]; then > - git diff-files --quiet && > - git diff-index --cached --quiet HEAD -- || > + git diff-files --ignore-submodules --quiet && > + git diff-index --ignore-submodules --cached --quiet HEAD -- || > die "Cannot rewrite branch(es) with a dirty working directory." > fi > > -- > 1.6.1.1.598.g140d5