Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 30, 2005, 09:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr78yv72n.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vfypey573.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes: > >> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> >>> I have actually resolved one conflicting merge with this and it >>> was OK, except that it was a bit unpleasant when I first did >>> "git-diff-index HEAD" without giving any path ;-), >> >> What does "git-diff-files" do? Just output a lot of nasty "unmerged" >> messages? > > That was not what was unpleasant. What was unpleasant was those > "unmerged" messages were buried under heap of normal diffs, > showing the successfully merged entries as the result of merge. > > I am inclined to munge your patch to do this:
This I have done, and pushed out to "pu" for tonight. After doing some more test I'll have this graduate to "master" sometime tomorrow along with other accumulated changes.