Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Nov 30, 2005, 02:06 UTC
Message-ID: <7vek4y51ph.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511291742000.3135@g5.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:

Show 6 quoted lines

> If we left things in the index in an unmerged state, we'd be guaranteed to 
> either _fail_ that git commit unless somebody has done the 
> git-update-index (or names the files specifically on the commit command 
> line, which will do it for you).
>
> So I think I agree.

I suspect we are saying the same thing.  Funny.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.