Re: [RFC] adding support for md5
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Aug 22, 2006, 06:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr6z9s376.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060821204430.GA2700@tuatara.stupidest.org>
Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:50:32PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> I can see the point of configurable hashes, but it would be for a >> stronger hash than sha1, not for a (much) weaker one. > > Why any configuration option at all? What in practice does it really > buy?
I personally am not interested in making this configurable at all. The hashcmp() change on the other hand to abstract out 20 was a good preparation, if we ever want to switch to longer hashes we would know where to look.