Re: [RFC/PATCH] Enhance core.logallrefupdates
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Oct 8, 2006, 19:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr6xiio02.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <egaibi$bb$1@sea.gmane.org>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> Come to think of it, it might make sense to change the >> meaning of "true" to do what this patch does. I do not think >> of reasons to create missing reflog for tags automatically >> anyway. > > If we change meaning of "true", perhaps (just in case in case) we > should add "all" value?
Didn't I just say that I do not think of reasons to do so ;-)?
Saying "just in case" is not enough. You need to say at least "this hypothetical workflow which requires to update refs/xxx and doing automated reflog creation only under refs/heads makes that workflow less convenient".