From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:52:29 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Enhance core.logallrefupdates
Message-ID: <7vr6xiio02.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <egaibi$bb$1@sea.gmane.org>

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

>>    Come to think of it, it might make sense to change the
>>    meaning of "true" to do what this patch does.  I do not think
>>    of reasons to create missing reflog for tags automatically
>>    anyway.
>
> If we change meaning of "true", perhaps (just in case in case) we
> should add "all" value?

Didn't I just say that I do not think of reasons to do so ;-)?

Saying "just in case" is not enough.  You need to say at least
"this hypothetical workflow which requires to update refs/xxx
and doing automated reflog creation only under refs/heads makes
that workflow less convenient".