Re: clone breaks replace
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 11, 2011, 17:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr5cj49vi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110111053653.GB10094@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> Sure, I think that is a sane way for the user to think about it, but do > we actually support multiple views? I thought replacement objects were > all or nothing.
It is not implausible for a long running large project to restart their history from a physical root commit every year, stiching the year-long segments together at their ends with replacements, to make a default clone to get a year's worth of the most recent history while allowing people to get more by asking, no?
Of course, if you trust shallow-clones, you do not have to do that kind of history surgery ;-).