From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:40:17 GMT Subject: Re: clone breaks replace Message-ID: <7vr5cj49vi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20110111053653.GB10094@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > Sure, I think that is a sane way for the user to think about it, but do > we actually support multiple views? I thought replacement objects were > all or nothing. It is not implausible for a long running large project to restart their history from a physical root commit every year, stiching the year-long segments together at their ends with replacements, to make a default clone to get a year's worth of the most recent history while allowing people to get more by asking, no? Of course, if you trust shallow-clones, you do not have to do that kind of history surgery ;-).