git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCHv2] Do not autosquash in case of an implied interactive rebase

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
May 29, 2012, 18:43 UTC
Message-ID
<7vr4u24ymc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To
<4FC3428F.4060202@lyx.org>
Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org> writes:
> Or did you mean that you want to imply "--interactive" when
> "--autosquash" is explicitly given ?

Come to think of it, it might have been a saner UI design when f59baa5 (rebase -i --autosquash: auto-squash commits, 2009-12-08) added this option, but if we want to go that route, we do need to address the concerns I raised in my response.

But as things stand, i.e. with --autosquash that does not imply -i, your patch is good.

Thanks.
Previous: Junio C Hamano
Message 6 of 6 in “Do not autosquash in case of an implied interactive rebase”
  1. Do not autosquash in case of an implied interactive rebaseVincent van Ravesteijn, May 24, 2012
  2. [PATCHv2] Do not autosquash in case of an implied interactive rebaseVincent van Ravesteijn, May 24, 2012
  3. Junio C HamanoMay 25, 2012
  4. Vincent van RavesteijnMay 28, 2012
  5. Junio C HamanoMay 29, 2012
  6. Junio C HamanoMay 29, 2012

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.