From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 18:43:07 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] Do not autosquash in case of an implied interactive rebase
Message-ID: <7vr4u24ymc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FC3428F.4060202@lyx.org>

Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org> writes:

> Or did you mean that you want to imply "--interactive" when
> "--autosquash" is explicitly given ?

Come to think of it, it might have been a saner UI design when
f59baa5 (rebase -i --autosquash: auto-squash commits, 2009-12-08)
added this option, but if we want to go that route, we do need to
address the concerns I raised in my response.

But as things stand, i.e. with --autosquash that does not imply -i,
your patch is good.

Thanks.