Re: [PATCH 1/2] rev list add option accepting revision constraints on standard input
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Sep 5, 2006, 22:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vpseaarrl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060905215157.GA29172@shadowen.org>
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> writes:
> Add a --stdin flag which causes rev-list to additionally read > its stdin stream and parse that for revision constraints.
Show 18 quoted lines
> +/*
> + * Parse revision information, filling in the "rev_info" structure,
> + * revisions are taken from stream.
> + */
> +static void setup_revisions_stream(FILE *stream, struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> + char line[1000];
> + const char *args[] = { 0, line, 0 };
> +
> + while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), stream) != NULL) {
> + line[strlen(line) - 1] = 0;
> +
> + if (line[0] == '-')
> + die("options not supported in --stdin mode");
> +
> + (void)setup_revisions(2, args, revs, NULL);
> + }
> +}Is calling setup_revisions() on the same revs like this many times safe? I do not think so, especially what is after the primary "for()" loop in the function.
I was sort-of expecting that you would instead replace that primary for() loop in setup_revisions() with some sort of callback...