Re: Decompression speed: zip vs lzo
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 9, 2008, 23:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vprwaeezp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <47855765.9090001@vilain.net>
Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> I think to go forward this would need a prototype and benchmark figures > for things like "annotate" and "fsck --full" - but bear in mind it would > be a long road to follow-up to completion, as repository compatibility > would need to be a primary concern and this essentially would create a > new pack type AND a new *object* type. Not only that, but currently > there is no header in the objects on disk which can be used to detect a > gzip vs. an lzop stream. Not really worth it IMHO - gzip is already > fast enough on even the most modern processor these days.
For the compression type detection, I was hoping that we could do something like sha1_file.c::legacy_loose_object(), but I tend to agree it is not probably worth it.