Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2010, #02; Wed, 17)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 24, 2010, 17:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vpqtutzkp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4CEC6E2A.9080605@kernel.org>
"J.H." <warthog9@kernel.org> writes:
> While I don't disagree, being able to support other caching systems > would be nice, we have this now, it's tested and it works. I'd argue > this is a step 1, step 2 case at this point.
I would have to agree; getting some cache layer that is known to work (you are battle testing your updates on a busy site of yours as you develop, right?) early, quick and dirty with minimum changes, is more beneficial than waiting for a large rewrite thats "gets it perfect this time".
> I'm currently working from on top of Jakub's last tree, though I've got > some questions about his reasoning on a few things now that I've been > digging into it.
Thanks both for keeping the ball rolling.