From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:13:10 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2010, #02; Wed, 17)
Message-ID: <7vpqtutzkp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <4CEC6E2A.9080605@kernel.org>

"J.H." <warthog9@kernel.org> writes:

> While I don't disagree, being able to support other caching systems
> would be nice, we have this now, it's tested and it works.  I'd argue
> this is a step 1, step 2 case at this point.

I would have to agree; getting some cache layer that is known to work (you
are battle testing your updates on a busy site of yours as you develop,
right?) early, quick and dirty with minimum changes, is more beneficial
than waiting for a large rewrite thats "gets it perfect this time".

> I'm currently working from on top of Jakub's last tree, though I've got
> some questions about his reasoning on a few things now that I've been
> digging into it.

Thanks both for keeping the ball rolling.