Re: Why does 'submodule add' stage the relevant portions?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 25, 2013, 18:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vppynxre7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0kx_uQy-97nByNXBOU4UruhvdjOeXCpKHR9mNUQHs5o=A@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm talking about slightly better defaults at the porcelain level, > at most.
If a change does not even have to break backward compatibilty, that is a regular enhancement and independent from 2.0, no?