From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:31:44 GMT
Subject: Re: Why does 'submodule add' stage the relevant portions?
Message-ID: <7vppynxre7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0kx_uQy-97nByNXBOU4UruhvdjOeXCpKHR9mNUQHs5o=A@mail.gmail.com>

Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:

> I'm talking about slightly better defaults at the porcelain level,
> at most.

If a change does not even have to break backward compatibilty, that
is a regular enhancement and independent from 2.0, no?