Re: Notes on Subproject Support
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jan 23, 2006, 08:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7voe23z6d6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v64ob1omh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
> BTW, let's digress a bit.
Ugh. Serious typo.
Show 5 quoted lines
> I think recording "commit" in the tree objects is in line with > the logical organization described in README: "blob" and "tree" > represent a state, and have *nothing* to do with how we came > about to that state. The historyh is described in "commit" > objects. The bound commit approach keeps that property.
Obviously, I think "*NOT* recording commit in tree objects" is in line with "blobs and trees are about states, commits give them their points in history".