From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:38:29 GMT
Subject: Re: Notes on Subproject Support
Message-ID: <7voe23z6d6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <7v64ob1omh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:

> BTW, let's digress a bit.

Ugh.  Serious typo.

> I think recording "commit" in the tree objects is in line with
> the logical organization described in README: "blob" and "tree"
> represent a state, and have *nothing* to do with how we came
> about to that state.  The historyh is described in "commit"
> objects.  The bound commit approach keeps that property.

Obviously, I think "*NOT* recording commit in tree objects" is
in line with "blobs and trees are about states, commits give
them their points in history".