Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Implement 'prior' commit object links (and other commit links ideas)
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Apr 25, 2006, 19:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vodypv3gz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604251233340.3701@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Then we should drop the author header and make it part of free >> form text. The core does not give any meaning to it. > > Sure it does. It's an integral part of logging: we not only verify the > format, we also have multiple different ways of showing it. So it > definitely changes the way we "act", very fundamentally.
Unfair ;-). I'd consider "git log" semi-Porcelain and consider rev-list and cat-file the true core level.
But you already made it clear that you are not opposed to 'note' with a clear semantics "we _ignore_ it", the point was moot.
Sorry for the noise.